Hammett

Hammett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20193:19-cv-00605California974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19-CV-605 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. LEAVE TO SEEK TO FILE

CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBITS UNDER

MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.,

SEAL AND GRANTING

Defendants. DEFENDANTS AN OPPORTUNITY

TO RESPOND TO UNTIMELY

EVIDENCE

17 (ECF No. 98)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Ex Parte Motion to Submit Exhibits to be Seen in Camera to Chambers (“Ex Parte Mot.,” ECF No. 98), in which she “respectfully ask[s] the Court to make an order granting leave to submit six (6) exhibits Plaintiff intended to offer in camera at the hearing of October 24, 2019 that was vacated on October 17, 2019.” Id. at 1–2. Ms. Hammett explains that “[t]he exhibits were not offered with the other seventeen (17) exhibits lodged as ECF No. 78-3 because they were marked ‘Confidential’ before being transmitted to Plaintiff by Patrick C. McGarrigle.” Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.