Raymond
Raymond v. FCA US, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 JESSE RAYMOND, Case No.: 19-CV-01762 W (WVG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 3] FCA US LLC, et. al, Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Defendant FCA US LLC’s motion to dismiss Count III of the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Mot. [Doc. 3].) Plaintiff has failed to oppose. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the motion [Doc. 3]. Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c) provides that “[i]f an opposing party fails to file papers in the manner required by Local Rule 7.1.e.2, that failure may constitute a consent to the granting of that motion or other ruling by the court.” The Ninth Circuit has held that a district court may properly grant a motion to dismiss for failure to respond. See 1 ||…