Garrison
Garrison v. Ringgold
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual, Case No.: 19cv244-GPC(RBB) and CHRISTINE GARRISON, an 12 individual , ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERDEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs,
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
14 v. [Dkt. No. 33.]
REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III
aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an individual, ROSEGOLD 17 INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware Partnership, and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a 19 California Corporation, 20 Defendants.
22 Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants’ motion for attorney’s fees 23 pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute under California Code of Civil Procedure section 24 425.16(c). (Dkt. No. 33.) Defendant/Counterclaimant Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III 25 filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 38.) Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants replied. (Dkt. No. 39.) 26 Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS in PART Plaintiffs’ motion for 27 attorney’s fees. 28 Background Plaintiff Tommy Garrison, who is…