Farr

Farr v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20193:16-cv-01279California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES EMMETT FARR, Case No.: 16-CV-1279 JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. SECOND MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. (ECF No. 94)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Emmett Farr’s Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Temporary Restraining Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 94), accepted on discrepancy on October 29, 2019. See ECF No. 95. In essence, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its September 26, 2019 Order denying as moot Plaintiff’s August 26, 2019 ex parte motion requesting reconsideration of the Court’s June 20, 2016 denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order. See ECF Nos. 3, 82, 88. As a preliminary matter, “the Court notes that there is nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules of Civil Procedure that provides for multiple motions for reconsideration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.