Farr
Farr v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES EMMETT FARR, Case No.: 16-CV-1279 JLS (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. SECOND MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al.,
Defendants. (ECF No. 94)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Emmett Farr’s Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Temporary Restraining Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 94), accepted on discrepancy on October 29, 2019. See ECF No. 95. In essence, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its September 26, 2019 Order denying as moot Plaintiff’s August 26, 2019 ex parte motion requesting reconsideration of the Court’s June 20, 2016 denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order. See ECF Nos. 3, 82, 88. As a preliminary matter, “the Court notes that there is nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules of Civil Procedure that provides for multiple motions for reconsideration…