Raya

Raya v. Calbiotech

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20193:18-cv-02643California1,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

22 On November 19, 2018, Plaintiff Robert Raya, proceeding pro se, initiated this 23 action by filing a Complaint against Defendant Calbiotech, Inc. (“Calbiotech”). (ECF No. 24 1). In the Complaint, Raya, a former employee of Calbiotech, alleges that Calbiotech 25 violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 26 1132, by failing or refusing to provide Raya with a summary plan description of 27 Calbiotech’s 401(k) profit sharing plan within thirty days of Raya’s request. Raya seeks 28 On May 21, 2019, Calbiotech filed a Counterclaim against Raya. (ECF No. 14). Calbiotech alleges that by filing the Complaint, Raya breached a separation agreement Raya signed when he terminated his employment with Calbiotech. Calbiotech seeks declaratory relief, an order requiring Raya to pay back $12,500 in severance pay Raya received from Calbiotech, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On June 13, 2019, Raya filed a Motion to Dismiss Calbiotech’s Counterclaim. (ECF No. 15). On August 15, 2019, the Court denied Raya’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 17). On September 10, 2019, Calbiotech filed 1) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.