Mohamed
Mohamed v. Kellogg Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 TASNEEM L. MOHAMED, Case No. 3:14-cv-02449-L-MDD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION
TO CONTINUE CLASS
v.
CERTIFICATION BRIEFING
KELLOGG COMPANY,
15 Defendant.
17 Pending before the Court in this putative consumer class action alleging false and misleading food labeling is the Joint Motion to Continue Class Certification Briefing Schedule. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. Plaintiff's initial motion to certify a class action was denied without prejudice on March 23, 2019, based on Comcast Corp v. Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013), and Vaquero v. Ashley Furniture Indus., 824 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2016), because Plaintiff's proposed model of damages did not meet the predominance requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). (Doc. no. 88.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file another class certification motion supported by adequate proof. (Id.) Plaintiff timely filed her renewed motion on May 22, 2019. (Doc. no. 89.) 28 On June…