Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:18-cv-00361California1,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18cv361-JLS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 87] 14 15 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third request for appointment of counsel.1 On October 15, 2019, nunc pro tunc, Plaintiff submitted a motion for appointment of counsel that was accepted by the Court on discrepancy on October 23, 2019. ECF Nos. 86, 87. On October 31 ,2019, nunc pro tunc, Plaintiff submitted additional evidence in support of his request for appointment of counsel that was accepted by the Court on discrepancy on November 6, 2019. ECF Nos. 90, 91. In support, Plaintiff claims that he cannot adequately litigate this case for the following reasons: / / / / / /

27 1 On April 25, 2019, the Court denied without prejudice Plaintiff’s requests for counsel filed on 28 (1) “he is now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.