Reed
Reed v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18cv361-JLS-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 87] 14 15 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s third request for appointment of counsel.1 On October 15, 2019, nunc pro tunc, Plaintiff submitted a motion for appointment of counsel that was accepted by the Court on discrepancy on October 23, 2019. ECF Nos. 86, 87. On October 31 ,2019, nunc pro tunc, Plaintiff submitted additional evidence in support of his request for appointment of counsel that was accepted by the Court on discrepancy on November 6, 2019. ECF Nos. 90, 91. In support, Plaintiff claims that he cannot adequately litigate this case for the following reasons: / / / / / /
27 1 On April 25, 2019, the Court denied without prejudice Plaintiff’s requests for counsel filed on 28 (1) “he is now…