Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20193:17-cv-01436California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17-CV-01436-GPC-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REJECTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. AMENDED MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE &

ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP;

[ECF No. 235]

QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT

YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a federally-recognized Indian tribe; and

DOES 1 THROUGH 100,

18 Defendant.

20 Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane, LLP’s (“Plaintiff”) filed, without permission of the 21 Court, an amended motion for judgment on the pleadings on October 22, 2019. ECF No. 22 235. The original motion for judgment on the pleadings was filed on October 2, 2019. 23 ECF No. 227. 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 15(a), “a party may amend its 25 pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is filed.” 26 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Rule 15(a) specifically provides that a party may amend a 27 1 || “pleading” and this term “must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.