Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17-CV-01436-GPC-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REJECTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. AMENDED MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE &
ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP;
[ECF No. 235]
QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT
YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a federally-recognized Indian tribe; and
DOES 1 THROUGH 100,
18 Defendant.
20 Plaintiff Williams & Cochrane, LLP’s (“Plaintiff”) filed, without permission of the 21 Court, an amended motion for judgment on the pleadings on October 22, 2019. ECF No. 22 235. The original motion for judgment on the pleadings was filed on October 2, 2019. 23 ECF No. 227. 24 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 15(a), “a party may amend its 25 pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is filed.” 26 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Rule 15(a) specifically provides that a party may amend a 27 1 || “pleading” and this term “must be…