Kreep

Dorsey, Jr. v. Kreep

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20193:18-cv-02588California2,671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY C. DORSEY, Case No.: 18-cv-02588-AJB-MSB

MARGARETE S. DORSEY,

ORDER: Plaintiffs, (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT v. WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT TO GARY KREEP, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and 15 Defendant, (2) DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

LEAVITT INVESTMENT CO., AS MOOT

17 Real Party in Interest. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2) 19 Pro se Plaintiffs Wesley C. Dorsey, Jr. and Margarete S. Dorsey (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Judge Gary Kreep (“Defendant Judge Kreep”) alleging fraud on the court and violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiffs have not paid the $400 filing fee required to commence this action, but instead have filed Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.