United States of America for the Use and Benefit of: McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Halbert Construction Company, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the Case No.: 17-CV-803-CAB-WVG use and benefit of: 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
9 McCULLOUGH PLUMBING, INC., RECONSIDERATION
10 Plaintiff,
11 v. [Doc. Nos. 188] 12 HALBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al., 13 Defendants. 14
15 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND
COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD
16 PARTY COMPLAINT 17 18 On September 27, 2019, the Court entered an order denying a motion by 19 McCullough Plumbing, Inc. and the Guarantee Company of North America for attorneys’ 20 fees, nontaxable costs, and prejudgment interest. McCullough now moves for 21 reconsideration of that order pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) on the grounds that, according to 22 McCullough, it was manifestly unjust not to award McCullough and Guarantee their fees 23 and prejudgment interest. The motion for reconsideration is denied. 24 In the motion for reconsideration, McCullough and Guarantee simply restate the 25 arguments they made in their original motion. The Court, however, considered the…