United States of America for the Use and Benefit of: McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Halbert Construction Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20193:17-cv-00803California1,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the Case No.: 17-CV-803-CAB-WVG use and benefit of:

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

McCULLOUGH PLUMBING, INC., RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff,

v. [Doc. Nos. 188] HALBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al., 13 Defendants.

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND

COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD

PARTY COMPLAINT 17 On September 27, 2019, the Court entered an order denying a motion by McCullough Plumbing, Inc. and the Guarantee Company of North America for attorneys’ fees, nontaxable costs, and prejudgment interest. McCullough now moves for reconsideration of that order pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) on the grounds that, according to McCullough, it was manifestly unjust not to award McCullough and Guarantee their fees and prejudgment interest. The motion for reconsideration is denied. In the motion for reconsideration, McCullough and Guarantee simply restate the arguments they made in their original motion. The Court, however, considered the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.