Roberts

Roberts v. Levine

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20193:19-cv-00567California9,936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

23 A. Procedural History 24 On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint. (ECF No. 25 1). Plaintiff filed Proofs of Service as to Louise Stokes and Anil Stokes on April 6, 2019 26 (ECF Nos. 3-4), and as to Anjali Levine on April 15, 2019 (ECF No. 5). Louise Stokes and 27 Anil Stokes filed Motions to Dismiss the Complaint on April 29, 2019 (ECF Nos. 6-7), but 28 Anjali Levine never filed a responsive pleading. On May 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default as to Anjali Levine. (ECF No. 9). The Clerk entered default on May 2, 2019. (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on May 21, 2019. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff brings claims against Anjali Levine and Louise Stokes for 1) intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”); 2) assault and battery; 3) violation of the Bane Act, section 52.1 of the California Civil Code; 4) invasion of privacy; 5) civil harassment; 6) stalking; 7) fraud; 8) deceit; 9) scheme to defraud and communications fraud in violation of section 817.034 of the Florida Statutes; 10) violation of the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.