Reno Contracting, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 RENO CONTRACTING, INC., Case No.: 18-CV-0450 W (JLB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b) CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY [DOC. 79]
INSURANCE COMPANY,
20 Defendant.
22 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (Mot. [Doc. 79].) Plaintiff has failed to respond. The Court decides the matter without oral argument and on the papers submitted pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion [Doc. 79]. 28 I. BACKGROUND Since March 2019, Plaintiff has ceased to litigate this case. [Docs. 55, 62.] As a result, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). [Doc. 73.] On August 14, 2019, Defendant provided the Court with notice of Plaintiff’s…