Siegler

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20193:18-cv-01681California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA ELIZABETH SIEGLER, et al. Case No. 3:18-cv-01681-GPC-MSB Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO vs. HEAR MOTIONS FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., et RECUSAL BEFORE THE al.,

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendants. [ECF No. 145.]

17 On August 20, 2019, Plaintiff Sara Elizabeth Siegler’s (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion 18 for reconsideration of the judgment entered on August 2, 2019. ECF Nos. 126, 127, 134. 19 The Court noticed the motion for a hearing on November 15, 2019. ECF No. 139. On 20 September 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a subsequent motion seeking the Court’s recusal from 21 this matter. ECF No. 142. To accommodate Plaintiff’s concurrent request for an 22 extension in the briefing schedule on the motion for reconsideration, and for the sake of 23 judicial economy, the Court set a new hearing on December 20, 2019 to hear the recusal 24 and reconsideration motions. ECF No. 143. On October 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.