Dizon

Dizon v. The Hertz Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20193:19-cv-01993California1,858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM DIZON, Case No.: 19-cv-01993-MMA (JLB)

Plaintiff,

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. REGULATING DISCOVERY

AND OTHER PRETRIAL

THE HERTZ CORPORATION,

PROCEEDINGS

Defendant.

17 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management Conference was held on November 19, 2019. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court understands that parties to litigation often enter into stipulations that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in specified way. Any motion for a protective order entering such stipulation(s) in this case shall be filed no later than December 6, 2019. The motion shall comply with Section V. of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. If the need for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.