Dorsey

Dorsey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20193:17-cv-01123California2,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK E. DORSEY, Case No.: 17cv1123-CAB-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT DANIEL PARAMO, et al., Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 65, 68] 16 Plaintiff Mark E. Dorsey, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983, alleging prison officials at R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility violated his rights under the United States Constitution. [Doc. No. 3.] The matter is now before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. All Defendants jointly move for summary judgment against Plaintiff, while Plaintiff only moves for summary judgment against the remaining correctional officer defendants and not against Dr. Shakiba. The motions have been opposed, and Plaintiff, but not Defendants, filed a reply brief. The Court deems the motions suitable for submission without oral argument and that no report…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.