Hawkins

Hawkins v. The Kroger Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20193:15-cv-02320California1,869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAVONDA HAWKINS, on behalf of Case No.: 15cv2320 JM(BLM) herself and all others similarly situated

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION

Plaintiff, TO AMEND ANSWER AND v. MOTION TO STRIKE

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

THE KROGER COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Presently before the court is Plaintiff Shavonda Hawkins’ motion to strike affirmative defenses filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 12(f). (Doc. No. 60.) The motion has been briefed and the court finds it suitable for submission on the papers and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND On October 15, 2019, Plaintiff Shavonda Hawkins filed this putative class action asserting a myriad of violations of California’s consumer protection laws, along with claims for breach of express warranty and implied warranty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.