Gustine

Gustine v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20193:19-cv-00903California2,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT EDWARD GUSTINE, Case No. 3:19-cv-00903-LAB-NLS

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

Plaintiff, DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS

vs. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (2) ISSUING

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, [ECF No. 11] Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff has brought this action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when he was housed at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”) in November of 2018. (See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 10.) Defendant County of San Diego moves to dismiss all the claims in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint1

26 1 Plaintiff requested and was granted leave to amend his original Complaint in response to Defendants’ initial motion to dismiss on August 1, 2019. (See ECF No. 9.) 28 (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Def.’s Mot., ECF No. 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.