Ganoe

Ganoe v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20193:19-cv-00360California2,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUDY M. GANOE, Case No.: 19cv360-CAB-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING CROSS

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. Nos. 17, 20] ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. [Doc. Nos. 17 and 20.] For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 17] is DENIED, and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 20] is GRANTED. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff appeals the denial of her December 9, 2015 application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) (Transcript of Certified Administrative Record (AR) 70, 157). The Commissioner denied the application initially and on reconsideration (AR 87–95, 312–15). Plaintiff requested a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), and the ALJ heard Plaintiff’s case on December 21,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.