Tuck
Tuck v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ZACH TUCK, Case No.: 19-CV-1270-CAB-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. et al., [Doc. No. 70] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC’s (“PRA”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. No. 70.] The Court deems the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On July 10, 2019, Plaintiff Zach Tuck proceeding pro se, filed his initial complaint against nineteen defendants alleging violations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (“TCPA”); the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”); the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15…