Bloom

Bloom v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20193:17-cv-02324California963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BLOOM, et al., Case No.: 17cv2324-AJB (MSB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. APPLICATION TO VACATE CLASS

DISCOVERY AND CLASS CERTIFICATION

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

DEADLINES CONTAINED IN THE THIRD

Defendants. AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

PENDING DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 98] 18 On November 25, 2019, Plaintiffs submitted their “Ex Parte Application to Vacate Class Discovery and Class Certification Deadlines Contained in the Third Amended Scheduling Order Pending Decision on Plaintiff’s Motion to File Second Amended Complaint.” (ECF No. 98.) In their application, Plaintiffs note that their “Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint” [ECF No. 93], which seeks to add causes of action to challenge the new Vehicle Habitation Ordinance (“New VHO”), is now pending before Judge Battaglia with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.