Caruso

Caruso v. Cavalry Portfolio SVCS

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20193:19-cv-01224California1,623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC CARUSO, Case No.: 19-CV-1224-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SVCS et al., [Doc. No. 42] Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC’s (“PRA”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. No. 42.] Defendant Hunt & Henriques filed a notice of joinder to PRA’s motion to dismiss. [Doc. No. 46.] The Court deems the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff Eric Caruso proceeding pro se, filed his initial complaint against nine defendants alleging violations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (“TCPA”); the Fair Debt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.