Thomas

Thomas v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20193:18-cv-01835California3,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT THOMAS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01835-GPC-JLB

CDCR #E-88239,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

15 W. L. MONTGOMERY, et al. [Dkt. No. 23.] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Before the Court is Defendants J. Garcia, J. Ramirez, Jr., A. Beltran and J. Coronado’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Plaintiff did not file an opposition. The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Procedural Background Plaintiff Albert Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner currently incarcerated at North Kern State Prison in Delano, California, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.