Ewing

Ewing v. LeadExcel, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20193:18-cv-02845California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON EWING, Case No.: 18cv2845-LAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER STRIKING RENEWED

v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

DEFAULT

LEADEXCEL, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 After the Court construed a joint answer as the answer of Defendant Ron Taylor only, and not also LeadExcel, Plaintiff Anton Ewing quickly filed a request for entry of default. The Court instructed the Clerk not to enter default immediately, but instead gave LeadExcel 21 additional days, i.e., until November 25, to respond. (See Docket no. 37.) If it did not respond by that date, Ewing was permitted to renew his request. Ewing has now filed a document identified as a request for entry of default, including a points and authorities section chiding the Court for — in his view— misunderstanding the law and his briefing, and miscalculating dates. This was improper and pointless, and furthermore Ewing is wrong about the law. The Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.