Parabia

State Bank of Texas v. Parabia

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20193:14-cv-03031California451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Case No.: 14-cv-3031-L-DHB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING ORDER TO

v. SHOW CAUSE SAM PARABIA, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 16, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order relative to the judicial foreclosure of Defendants' residence. (See doc. no. 295 ("TRO").) Among other things, the TRO ordered Defendants to show cause why its terms should not stay in effect during the entire redemption period following judicial foreclosure. (Id. at 12-13.) Defendants timely filed their response (doc. no. 298) and Plaintiff replied (doc. no. 300). Defendants object to the TRO only insofar as it requires them to pay rent while they remain in possession of the property during the period of redemption. Payment of rent was ordered pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 729.090(a) 26 27 28 1 1 || which provides that "[f]rom the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.