Herrera

Herrera v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20193:18-cv-02328-JLS-RNBCalifornia6,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE H., Case No.: 3:18-cv-02328-JLS-RNB

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

JUDGMENT

Social Security,1 15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 15, 16)

17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(c) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On October 10, 2018, plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. (See ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court and ready for decision are the parties’ cross-motions for

27 Andrew Saul is hereby substituted as the defendant in this case per Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.