Arellano

Arellano v. Ojeda

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20193:14-cv-02401California3,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No. 14cv2401-MMA (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT ON QUALIFIED

E. OJEDA, et al.,

IMMUNITY;

Defendants. [Doc. No. 101]

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STRIKE

[Doc. No. 103] 19 20 Plaintiff Raul Arellano, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of allegations that prison officials failed to adequately respond when his cell toilet clogged and overflowed over the course of a long weekend. Defendants O. Mack and L. Helmick move for summary judgment on the grounds that they are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. See Doc. No. 101. Plaintiff moves to strike Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 103. For the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.