Clark v. CoreCivic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20193:19-cv-00781California1,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN CLARK, Case No.: 19-CV-781-BAS-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CORECIVIC, INC.; and DOES 1 to 10, Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is CoreCivic, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Supplemental Motion for Sanctions. (Doc. No. 25.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND On August 16, 2019, this Court issued the operative Discovery and Pre-Trial Scheduling Order. (Doc. No. 13.) On October 16, 2019, the Parties informed Chambers of Plaintiff’s failure to produce any documents corresponding with her untimely served responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents (“RFPs”). In response, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) on that same day. (Doc. No. 15.) In summary, the OSC required Plaintiff to act by October 23, 2019 by either producing all responsive documents …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.