Farr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EMMETT FARR, Case No.: 16-CV-1279 JLS (MSB)

CDCR #T-51954,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND 14 (2) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WARDEN DANIEL PARAMO, et al., CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendants. STOUT SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m)

(ECF No. 73)

Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 by Defendants Hernandez, Ramrakha, and Barnard1 (“MSJ,” ECF No. 73), as well as Plaintiff James Emmett Farr’s Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 92) and Defendants’ Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 95). For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and ORDERS Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE no later than thirty (30) days from the date this Order…