Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. v. Tracelink Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20193:13-cv-01743California2,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 UNISONE STRATEGIC IP, INC., CASE NO.: 3:13-cv-1743-GPC-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STAY

TRACELINK, INC., [ECF. No. 127] Defendant. 19 Defendant TraceLink, Inc. (“Defendant” or “TraceLink”) filed a motion to stay the case on November 12, 2019. Plaintiff Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Unisone”) filed an opposition on December 2, 2019. ECF No. 132. TraceLink filed a reply on December 10, 2019. ECF No. 133. The Court finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Upon review of the moving papers, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to stay. I. Background On July 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed its initial Complaint asserting infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 6,996,538 (“the ’538 patent”) against Defendant. ECF No. 1. After a period of motion practice, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.