Gaines

Gaines v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 10, 20193:19-cv-00946California6,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES GAINES, an individual; Case No.: 19-cv-946 GPC MSB RYAN BAGSBY, an individual; MARIO 12 HALL, JR., an individua, BRANISHA ORDER DENYING AT&T’S NEWBERRY, an individual; and MOTION TO COMPEL KENYATA MARTIN, an individual, ARBITRATION AND DENYING

AT&T’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Plaintiff, 15 v. [ECF Nos. 30, 31] 16 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, a 17 Delaware Limited Liability Company; EMMANUEL (MANNY) MORALES, an Individual; and DOES 1 through 50, 19 inclusive, 20 Defendants.

22 Before the Court are Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC’s (“AT&T”) 23 Motion to Strike the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30) and Motion to Compel 24 Individual Arbitration as to Plaintiffs Branisha Newberry and Kenyata Martin (ECF No. 25 31). Defendant Emmanuel (Manny) Morales (“Morales”) joins both motions. ECF Nos. 26 32, 33. 27 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are five former African-American AT&T employees who worked at the AT&T store in Mission Valley. Defendant Emmanuel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.