Tequida

Tequida v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20193:19-cv-02319California1,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ENRIQUE TEQUIDA, Case No.: 19cv2319 GPC (LL)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS APPLICATION AND

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden,

PREJUDICE

Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS The request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because Petitioner has not provided the Court with sufficient information to determine Petitioner’s financial status. A request to proceed in forma pauperis made by a state prisoner must include a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer showing the amount of money or securities Petitioner has on account in the institution. Rule 3(a)(2), 28 U.S.C. foll.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.