Siegler

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20193:18-cv-01681California5,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA ELIZABETH SIEGLER, et al. Case No. 3:18-cv-01681-GPC-MSB Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR vs. RECONSIDERATION AND

RECUSAL

SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., et al., [ECF No. 134, 142.] 15 Defendants.

On August 2, 2019, the Court dismissed with prejudice all the claims in Plaintiff Sara Elizabeth Siegler’s (“Plaintiff”) second amended complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.; TNK Therapeutics, Inc.; BDL Products, Inc.; Cargenix Holdings LLC; Prospect Chartercare Roger Williams Medical Center LLC; Henry Ji; Richard Paul Junghans; Steven C. Katz; and Tufts Medical Center (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 126.) The Clerk entered judgment. (ECF No. 127.) On August 30, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s decision to dismiss the SAC. (ECF Nos. 134, 136.) On September 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed a second motion seeking that Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the assigned judge handling this 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.