Zakosky

Zakosky v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20193:17-cv-01373California1,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ZAKOSKY, Case No.: 17cv1373-JAH (BGS) Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AND DENYING MOTION TO

AFFAIRS,

APPOINT COUNSEL (Doc. No. 7) Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION On July 6, 2017, Plaintiff Richard Zakosky (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint with the Court along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion to appoint counsel. Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3. On October 24, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, denied his motion to appoint counsel, and on sua sponte screening, dismissed the complaint without prejudice. See Doc. No. 4. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on November 17, 2017. See Doc. No. 7. On August 17, 2018, Plaintiff’s FAC was dismissed without prejudice for failure to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.