Neville
Neville v. Dill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT NEVILLE, MD, Case No.: 19cv321-CAB-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. RULE 60 MOTION [Doc. No. 34] AND
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
MARGUERITE DILL, HEARING [Doc. No. 35] Defendant.
17 On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff Robert Neville (“Plaintiff”) filed a “Voluntary 18 Dismissal” [Doc. No. 25], which this Court deemed an ex parte motion to dismiss 19 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(2) [Doc. No. 26]. On September 6, 2019, pursuant 20 to its complete discretion under Rule 41(a)(2), the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion, 21 dismissed the action with prejudice, and awarded Defendant $1,000 in costs. [Doc. No. 22 30.] On September 6, 2019, judgment was entered accordingly for Defendant. [Doc. No. 23 31.] On December 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Rule 60 Motion. [Doc. No. 34.] On 24 December 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request for telephonic hearing on pending Rule 60 25 motion. [Doc. No. 35.] For the reasons set forth…