Apple Inc. v. WI-LAN Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20193:14-cv-02235California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA APPLE INC., CASE NO. 14cv2235 DMS (BLM) Plaintiff, ORDER SUSTAINING APPLE’S vs. OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S NOVEMBER 7, 2019 WI-LAN, INC., DISCOVERY ORDER Defendant. _______________________________

AND ALL RELATED

COUNTERCLAIMS. 17 This case comes before the Court on Apple's objections to Magistrate Judge Barbara Major’s November 7, 2019 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Enforce the Court’s July 22, 2019 Order. Wi-LAN filed an opposition to Apple's objections, and Apple filed a reply. After thoroughly reviewing these briefs, the Magistrate Judge's Order and the relevant case law, the Court sustains Apple's objections. A magistrate judge's decision on a nondispositive issue is reviewed by the district court under the "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard. U.S.C. § 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.