Lucore
Lucore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL M. LUCORE, Case No.: 3:18-cv-02382-L-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [ECF No. 28] WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendant. 16 Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Paul M. Lucore’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to vacate order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Wells Fargo’s attempted foreclosure on Plaintiff’s property for defaulting on a mortgage loan secured by the property. On August 31, 2006, Plaintiff obtained a loan for $376,000 [ECF No. 22-2 at 4-7], secured by a deed of trust against his property located at 10657 Felix Drive, Santee, CA 92071 [ECF No. 19- at 2-15]. Following this initial loan,…