Spatcher

Spatcher v. San Diego Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20193:19-cv-01919California3,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No. 19-cv-01919-BAS-BLM

CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2]

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF DEP’T; VISTA

DETENTION FACILITY; SAN DIEGO AND

CENTRAL JAIL; GEORGE BAILEY

DETENTION FACILITY; DEPUTY 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

ESCOBAR; DEPUTY LAKE; VISTA FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

DETENTION MEDICAL; CENTRAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) JAIL DEPUTIES, & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 Defendants.

Plaintiff Gregory Leon Spatcher, currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.