Prince

Prince v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20193:16-cv-00871California8,651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEOPHUS PRINCE, JR., Case No.: 16cv00871 BAS (KSC)

Petitioner,

DEATH PENALTY CASE

v.

ORDER:

RONALD DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin

State Prison, (1) RULING ON EXHAUSTION Respondent. STATUS OF DISPUTED CLAIM; 16 (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE [ECF No. 42]; (3) STAYING CASE; AND 18 (4) SETTING DEADLINES 19 On May 23, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Statement Regarding Exhaustion, agreeing that twenty-two claims and/or sub-claims in the federal Petition are exhausted, nine claims and/or sub-claims are unexhausted, and disagreeing on the exhaustion status of Claim XXV. (ECF No. 40.) In an Order dated June 3, 2019, the Court ruled on the exhaustion status of the agreed-upon claims and took the parties’ position statements on the disputed claim under submission for resolution along with the stay and abeyance matter. (ECF No. 41.) On June 13, 2019, Petitioner filed a Motion to Stay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.