Brangwynne

Smith v. Brangwynne

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20203:19-cv-00620California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS SMITH, Case No.: 19cv620-CAB-AHG Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT [Doc. No. DEPUTY K. BRANGWYNNE, et al., 10] AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR Defendant. FILING OF SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 17 On October 24, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for more definite statement. 18 [Doc. No. 10.] On December 2, 2019, in granting Plaintiff an extension of time to 19 oppose Defendants’ motion, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file either an opposition to the 20 motion or a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). [Doc. No. 14.] On December 20, 21 2019, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s More Definite Statement with Declaration in Support 22 Thereof [Doc. No. 23], which is filed as a response to the motion but is in the format of a 23 complaint. Therefore, it appears that Plaintiff is intending to file an SAC. However, the 24 document he has filed [Doc. No. 23] only has one cause of action, while the First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.