Santamariamuniz

Santamariamuniz v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20193:19-cv-02051California4,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:19-cv-02051-BAS-BGS

CESAR SANTAMARIA MUNIZ,

CDCR # AA-4341, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 14 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

D. PARAMO and J. CUEVAS,

§ 1915(a) [ECF No. 2] 16 Defendants. AND

18 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

20 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 22 Plaintiff Cesar Santamaria Muniz, a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison in Soledad, California, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Warden D. Paramo and Lieutenant J. Cuevas violated Plaintiff’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights during prison disciplinary proceedings that occurred while Plaintiff was housed at the Richard J. Donovan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.