Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20203:18-cv-00073California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIRHAWK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Case No.: 18cv73-MMA (AGS) California limited liability company,

ORDER RE: REDACTED VERSION

OF JANUARY 2, 2020 ORDER Plaintiff, v. ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, 15 Defendant. 17 On January 2, 2020, the Court issued an Order ruling on Defendant Ontel Products Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Daubert motions and motion for summary judgment. See SEALED Doc. No. 130. The Court directed the Clerk of Court to file the Order under seal. “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The Court finds that compelling reasons do not justify maintaining the entirety of the Order under seal. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.