Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIRHAWK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Case No.: 18cv73-MMA (AGS) California limited liability company,
ORDER RE: REDACTED VERSION
OF JANUARY 2, 2020 ORDER Plaintiff, v. ONTEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, 15 Defendant. 17 On January 2, 2020, the Court issued an Order ruling on Defendant Ontel Products Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Daubert motions and motion for summary judgment. See SEALED Doc. No. 130. The Court directed the Clerk of Court to file the Order under seal. “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The Court finds that compelling reasons do not justify maintaining the entirety of the Order under seal. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809…