Berryhill

Kennedy v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20203:18-cv-01859California592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY K., Case No.: 18-cv-1859-AJB-RBM

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, RECOMMENDATION (Doc. No. 28); 15 Defendant. (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 22);

(3) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 15); AND

22 (4) REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION

/ / /

27 1 Andrew M. Saul became Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019 and is therefore 28 Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s request that the Court review the commissioner’s denial of his claim for disability benefits. (Doc. Nos. 15, 22.) The Court referred the matter to Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.