Vigil

Vigil v. Coloplast Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20203:19-cv-01851California4,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BELINDA VIGIL, et al., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01851-GPC-BGS Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

v. AMEND THE SHORT FORM

COLOPLAST CORP., COMPLAINT.

14 Defendant. ECF No. 43. 16 Plaintiffs Belinda Vigil and her husband, Juan Vigil, seek leave from the Court to amend their short form complaint to include the Aris-Transobturator Sling System (the “Aris Sling”) as a product at issue. Defendant Coloplast Corporation opposes the amendment. Plaintiffs’ motion thus presents two questions for the Court: (1) whether a two-and-a-half-year-old amendment to the complaint that is unlikely to trigger much more discovery is unfairly prejudicial to the Defendant, and (b) whether Plaintiffs’ proposed amendment would futilely raise time-barred claims. The Court answers both questions in the negative, and thus GRANTS Plaintiff’s request to amend the complaint. I. Background On October 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.