Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20203:17-cv-00121California3,894 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE QUALCOMM Case No. 17-cv-00121-BEN-MSB
INCORPORATED SECURITIES
LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTIES APPLE INC.; COMPAL ELECTRONICS,
INC.; FIH MOBILE LTD.; HON HAI
PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.;
PEGATRON CORPORATION; AND
WISTRON CORPORATION’S
ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT THE PROTECTIVE
ORDER
21 WHEREAS Section 3.5 of the Protective Order in this action (ECF No. 78- 22 1) states that its provisions are without prejudice to the right of any party to seek 23 further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify the 24 Protective Order; and, 25 WHEREAS Section 10.1 of the Protective Order states that its provisions 26 should not be construed as prohibiting a non-party from seeking additional 27 protections for its confidential materials; and WHEREAS now before the Court is Non-Parties Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Compal Electronics, Inc. (“Compal”), Hon Hai…