Thomas
Thomas v. Doe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH THOMAS, Case No. 20cv0037 JAH (AHG)
Plaintiff,
SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF
v. SUCCESSIVE PETITION
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
JOHN DOE, Warden, et al., § 2244(b)(3)(A) GATEKEEPER Defendants. PROVISION 16 Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court does not rule on Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis because this case is summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) as indicated below. PETITION BARRED BY GATEKEEPER PROVISION The instant Petition is not the first Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Petitioner has submitted to this Court challenging his March 4, 2010 conviction in San Diego Superior Court case number SCD221955. On July 1, 2011, Petitioner filed in a Court a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in case No. 11cv1488. In that petition,…