Oliveira

Oliveira v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20203:18-cv-00674California527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DOMINGOS J. OLIVEIRA, CASE NO. 3:18-cv-00674-GPC-AHG

ORDER

Plaintiff, [ECF No. 9] 14 vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; CORECIVIC; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 October 11, 2019. ECF No. 9. After the motion was noticed for hearing on January 17, 2020, the Court issued a briefing schedule requiring the Plaintiff, Domingos J. Oliveira, to file his response brief on or before December 6, 2019. On December 20, 2019, CoreCivic filed a notice of non-opposition to its motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any opposition. Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2 requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within fourteen calendar days of the noticed hearing (or when otherwise scheduled by the Court). Civ. Local R. 7.1.e.2; Turner v. Berryhill, No. 17CV1130-CAB-BGS, 2018 WL 501010, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2018). Failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.