Johnson v. Athenix Physicians Group, Inc.'s

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20203:19-cv-01888California2,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY-ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01888-AJB-MDD Plaintiff, ORDER: v. 13 (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

ATHENIX PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC.

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

ET AL.,

AMEND, (Doc. No. 1); Defendants.

(2) DENYING AS MOOT

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

(Doc. No. 2); AND

19 (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, (Doc. No. 3)

22 Pro se Plaintiff Mary-Elizabeth Johnson (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against various state court judges, attorneys, and medical professionals, alleging fraud on the court. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee required to commence this action, but instead has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Doc. Nos. 2–3.) For the reasons set forth below, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.