Stone v. AT&T Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20203:18-cv-02028California6,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN STONE, an individual, Case No.: 3:18-cv-02028-GPC-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART VEHICLE’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

AT&T SERVICES, INC. a corporation;

JUDGMENT

VEHICLE AGENCY, LLC, a limited 15 liability company, and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, [ECF No. 33] Defendants. 18 Plaintiff John Stone filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against AT&T Services, Inc. (“AT&T”) and Vehicle Agency, LLC’s (“Vehicle”) on November 8, 2018, for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and for invasion of privacy. ECF No. 8. Before the Court is Vehicle’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 33. AT&T has joined Vehicle’s motion. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff filed an opposition on September 13, 2019. ECF No. 36. On September 30, 2019, Vehicle filed a reply. ECF No. 38. On November 15, 2019, the Court held oral argument and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.