Chatman

Chatman v. Toyota of Escondido

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20203:20-cv-00041California1,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC CHATMAN, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00041-CAB-LL

CDCR #BI-6355,

ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, (1) DENYING MOTION TO 14 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

(ECF No. 2); AND 16 TOYOTA OF ESCONDIDO, et al., (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

18 Defendants. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 20 21 Eric Chatman (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) located in San Quentin, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action in which he claims to have been raped at work at Toyota of Escondido in 1997 or 1998. (ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff did not pay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time he filed his Complaint; instead he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2.) I. Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.