McNally

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY S. MCNALLY, Case No.: 18-CV-1150 JLS (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. (ECF Nos. 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, DANIEL RIIS, 52) Defendant. 16 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Gregory McNally’s Motions in Limine (ECF Nos. 44–48). Also before the Court is Defendant Daniel Riis’ Motions in Limine (ECF Nos. 49–52). Defendant filed responses to Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine, (ECF Nos. 64–68), and Plaintiff likewise filed responses to Defendant’s Motions in Limine (ECF Nos. 69–72). The Court held oral argument on January 9, 2020. See ECF No. 74. Having reviewed the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court rules as follows. LEGAL STANDARD “Although the Federal Rules of Evidence do not explicitly authorize in limine rulings, the practice has developed pursuant to the district court’s inherent authority to manage the course of trials.” Luce v. United States, 469 U.S.…